Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard "Larry" Howe's avatar

Citizens and Members of Congress should have a real conversation about favorable tax treatments in the U.S. for energy industries. Do the wind and solar industries have access to these advantageous tax treatments: intangible drilling costs deduction, percentage depletion allowance, master limited partnerships, foreign tax credit and last in, first out (LIFO) accounting?

If the current Congress are convinced that eliminating favorable tax treatments for clean energy is needed, shouldn’t they first consider eliminating industry specific favorable tax treatments for the 100-plus-year-old fossil-fuel industries? Some analyses indicate that these historically costly tax breaks have cost taxpayers between $700 billion to $1 trillion over the last 50 years.

Here are the specific U.S. tax codes associated with fossil fuel industry tax breaks that should be considered for elimination:

Intangible Drilling Costs Deduction (IDCs) — 26 U.S. Code § 263(c): Allows oil and gas companies to deduct certain drilling costs immediately rather than capitalizing them.

Percentage Depletion Allowance — 26 U.S. Code § 613: Enables fossil fuel producers to deduct a percentage of their revenue to account for resource depletion.

Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) — 26 U.S. Code § 7704: Provides tax advantages by allowing certain fossil fuel companies to avoid corporate income tax.

Foreign Tax Credit — 26 U.S. Code § 901: Allows companies to offset taxes paid to foreign governments, benefiting multinational fossil fuel corporations.

Last In, First Out (LIFO) Accounting — 26 U.S. Code § 472: Permits fossil fuel companies to reduce taxable income by valuing inventory in a way that minimizes tax liability.

These provisions have historically provided significant financial advantages to the fossil fuel industry. Aggregating the estimated cumulative total over the last 50+ years we see:

Tax Expenditures: Approximately $666 billion

Direct Expenditures and R&D: Approximately $54 billion

Royalty Reliefs and Foregone Revenues: Approximately $28.9 billion

Total Estimated Direct Federal Subsidies (1970–2020): ~$749 billion

Note: These figures are adjusted to 2015 dollars where applicable.

Also note that this cost analysis of fossil fuel subsidies in the US does not include the biggest subsidy of all — the subsidy that when using their products as directed, they dump for free waste byproducts of excess heat trapping pollution that accumulate in the atmosphere for hundreds to thousands of years!

Let’s not forget, the world is decarbonizing and China is currently leading the world in clean energy technologies, deployments, and exports. So isn’t keeping US incentives for fossil fuels and eliminating US incentives for clean energy just giving more advantage to China?

To compete globally in the 21st century, shouldn’t we be incentivizing investments in 21st century decarbonized energy solutions? And if we are going to reduce and eliminate energy subsidies in the US, shouldn’t the real “perpetual” ones, the ones that have been in place 50–100 years, be eliminated FIRST?

Sources/references:

Two Thirds of a Century and $1 Trillion+ U.S. Energy Incentives Analysis of Federal Expenditures for Energy Development, 1950–2016

Management Information Services, Inc. (MISI) Study (2017)

https://www.nei.org/CorporateSite/media/filefolder/resources/reports-and-briefs/analysis-of-us-energy-incentives-1950-2016.pdf

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Reports (2016–2022)

Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) Report (2012)

Environmental Law Institute (ELI) Report (2009)

Our World in Data (2010–2022) — https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/fossil-fuel-subsidies?tab=chart&time=earliest..latest&country=~USA

Additional Reference: Clean Energy Tax incentives that the Republican Reconciliation bill wants to eliminate (as of May 15, 2025) taxfoundation.org/blog/ira-clean-energy-tax-credits-house-gop-ways-means-bill/

Expand full comment
Nick Anxgrs's avatar

The GIGO of climate science.

Garbage in – 1

GHE theory claims without it Earth would be 33 C colder becoming a -18 C ice ball.

Garbage in – 2

Ubiquitous GHE heat balance graphics violate GAAP & both LoT 1 & 2.

Garbage in – 3

GHE theory claims Earth upwells as a BB creating “extra” energy out of thin air violating LoT 1 & back radiation violating LoT 2.

= Garbage out

Mankind’s CO2 adversely affects the thermal behavior of the atmosphere.

GHE = Bogus & CAGW = scam.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts